There's a great anecdote about the very first concept taken of life, this concept and understanding occasioned a profound shift in ou understanding of ourselves.
we all leave in that single celestial body teeming with life, the womb in which we dwell.
Since the birth of this Earth, mankind Excel in misrepresenting the big picture, into a story of borders, subdivisions, and devising lines, the lines that from the vantage point of space, they never existed. too much hostility and not enough empathy. it ill conceive to address the challenge of a hyper-connected global world.
            Don't yo worry, Conflicts remain.

So, we need a new lens to address this inconsistencies, to scale up, exchanging ideas, beliefs, goods, extending our gaze.
    how come ?
so we all experience that feeling when you're really  connecting with somebody, you meet new person, they're really exciting and you find yourself hypnotized by their presence you find them bewitching and as you start to converse, as you start to share stories, you find that you come into this synchronized, you feel you're connected, like meshing, you feel like you're in the same vibe.

This is what we should look for when we connect with anybody, we should be like "Hey, you wanna brain couple with me ? you want  to sit and talk and get naked in brain  and couple brains together ?" because this is what I'm looking for, skip the small stock, skip the small talk, and go straight to that like intersubjective rapture.

There was a great scene in a movie and these two brothers that wished to become writers, We start learning about the story of their unfolding lives, the drama of their every day. One of the guys falls in love, and then his girlfriend commits suicide; something utterly tragic, erupts in his life, and the then the film continues, and, all in sudden, there's a scent that shows him frantically writing down. and the narrator tells us he felt guilty over the creativity triggered by his lover's death.


This notion that tragedy can lead to breakthrough, can lead to rebirth, that the instances of suffering in our lives can actually inspire us to make beautiful art is a sort of paradoxical ecstasy. We can take our wounds and we can turn them into something larger, that we need not have suffered in vain game, is a wild idea, because it doesn't mean that we are happy for our suffering.


It doesn't mean that we wished for these tragic things to happen to us as artists, but it means that we're able to take that pain, take that aching rhapsody and output something in the world and make a contribution, because at least that way, we validate the fact that we exist. we affirm ourselves.


We have no choice but to do so, in the face of entropy, in the face of death, to not say that we exist is to not live at all.

Jason Silva - Sots of awe

     The United Kingdom, England, Great Britain ? are these three the same place? are they different places ? Do British people secretly laugh those who use the terms wrongly ? who knows the answer to these questions? I do and I'm going to tell u right now.
    For the lost:this is the world, this is the European continent and this is the place we have to untangle. the area shown in purple is the United Kingdom. Part of the confusion is that the UK is not a single country but is instead a country of countries, it contains inside of it four co-equal and sovereign nations. The first of these is England-shown here is red. England is often confused with the UK as a whole because it's the largest and most populous of the nations and contains the capital city, London. to the north is Scotland, shown in blue and to the west is Wales, show is white. And often forgotten even by those who live in the UK, is Northern Ireland shown in Orange. Each country  has a local term for the population. While u can call them all British it's not recommended as the four countries generally don't like each other. The Northern Irish, Scottish and Welsh regard the English as slave-driving colonial masters --- no matter that all the three have their own devolved Parliaments and are allowed to vote on English laws despite the reverse not being true --  and the English generally regard the rest as rural yokels who spend too much time with their sheep. However, as the four constitent countries don't have their own passports, they are all British Citizens, like it or not, The are British Citizens of the UK whose full name by the way is the United Kingdom of great Britain and Northern Ireland.where is great Britain then ? Right here: the Rean covered in black is great Britain. Unlike England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Island, Great Britain is a geographical rather than a political term. Great Britain is the largest island among the British Isles. Within the United Kingdom, the term"Great Britain" is often used to refer to England, Scotland and Wales alone with the intentional exclusion of Northern Ireland. This is mostly, but not completely true, as all three constituent countries have islands that are not part of Great Britain such as the Isle of Wight, part of England, the Welsh, Isle of Anglesey and the Scottish Hebrides, The Shetland Islands, Orkney Islands, Islands of the Clyde.
     The second Biggest Island in the British Isles is Ireland, It is worth nothing that Ireland in not a country, like Great Britain, it is a geographical not a political term, The Island of Ireland contain on it two countries, Northern Ireland --  which we have already discussed -- and the republic of Ireland, when people say that they are Irish, they are referring to the Republic of Ireland which is separate country from the UK. However both Republic of Ireland and the UK are members of the European Union even though England often likes to pretend that it's an Island in the mid-Atlantic rather  than 50 KM off the cost of Franc. But that's a story for another time.

 PS: this is not my own article, it owns to Anand Prakash Anand and I came across to it while I was goggling... so happy reading 

 
     Just a moment ago, my friends posted in his Facebook page about his feeling toward Facebook website, and how much displeased he is about it , and that led me to try to write about it, I know that I'm shitty writer but I like to have my own full clear vision about a specific topic and I found talking about Social Network in general and Facebook in particular interesting enough, so to begin with I think I have to start with my 17 years old when I was allowed to have a first access to the Social Network...and I can tell that those little websites so psychologically powerful, that they don't even change what we do, they change who we are. Some of the things I do now with our devices- only a few years ago - I would have found it odd or disturbing, but they have quickly become to seem familiar, just how I do things.
      So neither I nor any one else can change the fact that Social Network has somehow
changed our lives, To the better Or the worst ? this question s answer depends on the self...Does this matters ? Of Course it does, we are setting up each other for trouble, trouble certainly in how we are relate to each other , but more trouble about how we are related to ourselves, for our capacity for our self-reflection, we are getting a new way of being alone together, people want to be with each other, but also elsewhere, connected to all the different places they want to be , they want to go in and out in places they want, because the thing that  matters most to them is control where they put they attention, but it can end up Hiding from each other.
        Texting, email, posting, blogging all of those things let us present the self as we wanted to be, we get to Edit and that means that we get to delete which means that we get to retouch. the face, the voice, the body not too little, ot too much just too right....human relationships are  rich and demanding and we just clean them up with technology.
       Personally, I prefer a real conversations, face to face because I just love to  look at how beautiful the smile drown in my friend's faces like the sun set clouds on fire rather then see some hhh , I like the real hugs and kisses rather than XOXO, I don't like to see ****is typing, i like to stare at the eyes of my beloved people, to read their eyes, some little Mega bites of Binary system can't do that even in video chatting, I like to hold my friends and my family's hands while talking to them, but.......exactly there will be always that BUT...
        We are being disturbed by many people in social network, I will take the case of Facebook, Facebook affords the option of Blocking people and if you can't block it because of some Protocols and etiquette there are an alternative way...put them in a category in which they don't see any activity you do, Facebook affords as I said of classifying your friend to "Close Friend", "People I don't want them" and so on.  you can give every category a specific features about how they can see you...which sometimes comes in handy...I mean all the time.
       So here you are dear readers in the end a quiz that you may wanna play; can you imagine yourself without social network life ? the place where you probably got to know a people who listen to you, cared about you, who made an impact in your life and became part of it, and by your absence you would make them anxious and worry about how and where you are ?  they can do other efforts in order to reach you and solve the puzzle of a disappearance? do they deserve to be hurt by you ? if yes then delete your database from Social Network...Just do it

  

        I say, "No, I don't" and to get to the reason why I answered this way, you and I have to think about success and failure a little differently than we're used to.
       To begin with, Winston Churchill once quoted as follow “Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts.”
       the fact of how scientists or entrepreneurs are not ashamed or afraid to share their failures should be pointed out. They share often and without hesitation because their goal is to advance everyone’s knowledge of how the world works, and figuring out how it doesn't work is an essential piece of that puzzle.
     To return to, I believe that what matters most is the lessons you learnt from our failures experiences, so instead of telling you my melodramatic sad failures stories, it would be better to sum up the scenario into WHAT I HAVE LEARNT FROM  ?, and here you some of it; if something isn't going to work, fail fast. Don't waste time, Don't tie yourself to a particular business model. Be ready to pivot; be ready to adapt.
     In the end those little failures experiences will just make you more practical, you will gain a real-world experience, will make u practitioner...isn't this enought
see? no drama just reality plus I'm not neither a scientist nor an entrepreneur...

Ibn Katheer mentioned some of these etiquettes, and among them are the following :

*One should neither recite nor touch the Qur’an except in a state of purification.
* One should use Siwak to clean his teeth before recitation.
* One should wear his best clothes.
* One should face the direction of prayer (Qiblah).
* One should pause his recitation when yawning.
* One should not interrupt his recitation and speak, except if necessary.
* One should be attentive to what he is reciting.
* One should pause at a verse mentioning reward and ask Allah for that reward.
* One should pause at a verse mentioning punishment and seek refuge in Allah from that punishment.
* One should not leave the Qur’an opened, nor place anything on it.
* One should not raise his voice when reciting to the extent that he confuses other adjacent recitors.
* One should not recite in marketplaces and places of distracting noise.

    The Qur’an is the word of Allah. The superiority of the Qur’an over the words of His creation is like the superiority of Allah Himself over His creation. The movement of the tongue in reciting the Qur’an is the best action that the tongue may ever perform.
      There are many virtues in teaching and reciting the Qur’an, some of which are the following :
* The reward of teaching : The Prophet  said: “The best of you are those who learn the Qur'an and teach it” (al-Bukhari).
* The reward of reciting : The Prophet  said: “Whoever reads one letter of the book of Allah will be rewarded for it with a good reward, and this good reward will be increased tenfold.”(at-Tirmidhi).
* The reward of learning the Qur’an, memorizing it and being skillful in its recitation : The Prophet  said: “The one who reads the Qur’an while having previously memorized it is with the noble dutiful angels, and the one who recites the Qur'an while it is difficult for him will receive two rewards. ” (al-Bukhari and Muslim) He also said: “It will be said (in Paradise) to the recitor of the Qur’an who acted upon its teachings: read, ascend, and beautify as you did in your worldly life, for indeed your level is that equal to your last verse.” (at-Tirmidhi)

Wrinting or at least good writing is an outgrowth of that urge to use language to communicate complex ideas and experiences between people.and that is true whether you're reading shakespeare or bad vimpare fiction, reading is always an act of empathy. It's always an imagining of what it's like to be someone

More people speak English than any other languege, but according to English langueges expert David Crystal, non-native speakers now outnumber native speakers by three to one."There's never before been  a languege that's been spoken more as a second languege than first,"he says. By the end of last year, the number of adult English speakers inAsia had reached 350 million. And according to the British Council, in ten years time 2 billion people will study Englsih and about half the world's population will speak it.

    He watched us with a dark scowl on his bitter face. The anticipation drained from his eyes, and then, just before the forest came between us, his face suddenly crumpled in pain.
I know that last glimpse of his face would haunt me until I saw him smile again. And right there I vowed that I would see him smile, and soon. I would find a way to keep my friend.
Edward kept his arm tight around my waist, holding me close. That was the only thing that held the tears inside my eyes. I had some seriouse problems. My best friend counted me with his enemies.

It is often said that reality mirrors art. In today's world of robotics and artificial intelligence, it is perhaps more accurate to talk about fact mirroring (science) fiction. The link between science fiction and reality has long been pooh-poohed by skeptics and scientists alike, but no-one on either side of the argument can question the fact that the world of sci-fi has increasingly become the world of wi-fi, in daily life from the world's poorest to the most developed countries.

But where did all this begin? For Generation X who believe, as indeed do most youth generations, that they invented everything, it may come as something of a surprise to learn that robotics has probably been around since the dawn of civilization.

Ancient cultures told stories in their myths and legends about 'artificial people,' and early Greeks and Muslim scholars devised prototypes of objects with what are now considered robotic characteristics and defining features. Leonardo da Vinci, thought of as the archetypical Renaissance Man, apparently made drawings of a mechanical knight which—or should that be who?—could sit up, wave its arms and move its head and jaw in what have come to be defined, with the benefit of retrospective hindsight, as the beginnings of a humanoid robot. And all of this some five hundred years before we had movies like Blade Runner or I, Robot to appeal to our futuristic senses. The seeds of the future are always planted in the past, it seems.

This link between fact and science fiction has given rise to many interesting discussions. Erudite and philosophical debates rage as to whether the popular TV sci-fi series Star Trek — now some 40 years old — was actually responsible for ushering in many of today's handheld devices. Proponents, and indeed major actors involved with the original series like William Shatner (a.k.a Captain James T. Kirk), contend that the writers were nothing short of visionaries — modern day equivalents of men like Da Vinci, who in the 15th century in some inexplicable way managed to see into the future and predict what was to come. Advocates of this idea point to devices such as the 'phaser,' and its much-loved accompanying TV-line, 'Set phasers to stun.' This program prop was like a gun that could immobilize or, on occasion, even kill an enemy or being by shooting rays at them. Fast forward to 2009; witness recent outrage and controversy over law enforcement 'aids' such as the taser, a hand-held gadget which can immobilize. Unfortunately this weapon has recently come in for some very bad press; a few well-publicized cases in North America and Canada bear witness to their potential as a deadly, lethal weapon. It is interesting to note, however, how the names of these two devices rhyme, lending yet more credibility to the idea that the one may have indeed spawned the other.

Sci-fi to wi-fi. Our world is more and more like a science-fiction TV show!

ps: I have found this artical really interesting that made me wanna blog it....hope u like it

     Our life is slipping away with eatch tick of the clock, tick by tick, second by second, time has moved on in seeemingly constant manner from the beginning of the universe to the present day, It's one of the few things we regard as regular and unchanging,
      Civilisations have risen and fallen, stars have been born and extinguished, and our one method of keeping track of every event in the universe and on earth has been comparing them to the present day with the regular passing of time.
         For Newton time is like an arrow fired from a bow, travelling in a direct straight line and never deviating from its path, To newton, one second on Earth was the same length of time as that same second on Mars, or Jupiter, or in deep space, and by applying this theory he was ablt to asume that  TIME MUST TICK FROM.